Tag Archives: Marketing

Directly Engage your Tech Partner to Avoid “Used Car Sales” Experience

The Internet has brought the worlds of marketing and technology together and customers expect their advertising agencies to be able to provide full service solutions on the web and social media. These solutions often include integration with internal systems and data that fall outside the core competences of the agency, who aren’t able to support the technology staff to provide these services on-demand and seek external partners to provide software solutions. Unfortunately, many companies feel that having an outside vendor provide technology solutions puts them at a disadvantage in the eyes of clients (and prospects) and try to funnel all communication through the agency and prevent the technology partner from directly interacting with the client.

I have written previously about the fundamental differences between solving technical and creative problems and this kind of collaborative solution demands both. Advertising and marketing firms are oriented to solve creative problems, but account executives often lack the training to perform the critical analysis necessary to define the requirements necessary for software development. When the agency buffers the tech provider from the end client, AEs aren’t able to provide feedback on how (and if) an objective can be accomplished or give “ballpark” pricing on items that come up during brainstorming. This means that every discussion requires the agency to go back to the software provider. I liken this to the “I have to ask my manager…” experience of buying a car. Is there any sales experience more frustrating as a consumer? This breeds distrust between the client and the AE – exactly the experience the agency was trying to avoid by keeping the solution provider away from the client. We have a saying at Algonquin Studios: “You will do what you fear most” and this is a perfect example. The things you fear drive your actions and inevitably it back fires. Like getting caught in a lie, the best way to avoid it is to tell the truth from the start. Face your fears honestly… problems delayed are problems expanded.

Advertising and marketing agencies need to educate their clients that technology providers are like the other traditional vendors (printers and media companies) they outsource to because they offer specialized services better suited to an organization designed around those competencies. Similarly, software vendors need to educate their agency customers about the added value they can bring when they are at the table with the customer.

Finally, if you are an agency that is afraid you will be cut out of business by your technology partner, get a new partner.

 


Early Adoption Means Just Signing Up

WARNING: To illustrate a serious point about your online presence, this post contains material that may be inappropriate for certain audiences. Viewer discretion is advised.

Somewhere out there, JethroTull118, just spent 117 clicks getting his account on Flickr. Maybe he was already JethroTull5 on MySpace, and JethroTull42 on Facebook. Maybe even @JethroTull on Twitter. But several years in, the chance that you’ll get your desired username on any social networking site is about as good as winning the Power Ball jackpot. A consistent name is 14K solid gold (as opposed to Santo gold) on the Internet and no one can tell what the next hot social network is going to be.

For this reason, Whenever a new site jumps into the public consciousness, I try and get the username “StevenRaines,” even if I don’t intend to use the service or even understand why it might be compelling. The reason is simple: I don’t want someone else grabbing that username and having followers and friends on other sites think it is me. I don’t want colleagues or potential clients thinking that someone else’s rantings are mine. my own rantings are OK, but there is simply no telling what someone who shares your name is going to post. Case in point, here’s a shot of my blog:

My site

If I had held off in signing up, like our friend @JethroTull, I might be SteveRaines1 and another user might have been stevenraines. Someone like this charming fellow, who shares my name and whose username (and URL) is only one letter different from mine:

The other site

To address this issue, some sites have adopted the OpenId / Facebook connect model but many sites still exclusively use or optionally offer the traditional username. While it isn’t always possible get the same username or to sign-up for every flash in the pan service, sign up early and often and keep your online brand consistent!

So where’s my invite to Google+ already?


Signing up or Giving In?

Earlier this year, I completed my assimilation into the three great “image” brands of our time. I have driven a Volkswagen for over 10 years and don’t travel without multiple daily stops at Starbucks. But after gifting my wife an iPhone for Christmas last year, I finally gave in and bought my first Apple product for myself. The marketing of each of these brands is simple and genius. In a throw back to the classic age of marketing, the message is simple: You’re “the kind of person” who uses these products. Not everyone gets it, but you do. You’re special and you belong. you know, a cult.

So after I switched to the iPhone, I started wondering, “Am I now one of these people?” Did buying an iPhone mean that I was suckered in to this message? Did it mean I needed to belong? Back in the 1980′s, I had a TRS-80, and through the Tandy line of computers, worked my way up though generations of PCs. Apple was always a computer company to me (and one that nearly suicided itself under John Sculley.) Apple made expensive products that weren’t upgradeable in an era when computers weren’t disposable commodities. At the end of the day, my real complaint about Apple wasn’t about price, or features, or anything else that they made. By the mid-90s, Apple owners were just smug and that irritated me.

I think that for companies to succeed with this the heart of this marketing is the fact that all these companies really do make good products. They don’t have to be perfect, and I don’t think that it works when the hype is considerably greater than the product can deliver. I think the iPhone is the best smart phone available today for the average consumer user, but Motorola still holds that title for the ruggedized business market… as evidenced by the complete failure of the iPhone w/ bar code scanner that was supposed to check me out at the Apple store. Apps still crash and data is still lost (even with no Adobe Flash, Mr. Jobs) but I am not about to switch to Motorola when I can FaceTime with my daughter when I am on the road. On the other hand, I am also not ready to switch from using a PC for work.

So I am now a proponent of Apple like I am of the other brands I mentioned above but I am trying to remain somewhat objective. I’m sure it won’t be a problem, right?

- written on my new iPad.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.